
ANNA KARENINA
Friends and Family Film editor Melanie Ann Oliver states, "Joe Wright gives everyone the license
and the confidence to
go further, while through the performances he will keep the movie grounded."
With such a bold visionary approach to Anna
Karenina, the director needed his cast to fully embrace
the theatre concept, as they would be required to perform their roles with no
self-awareness of the
artifice surrounding them. Through their efforts, movie audiences would be
engrossed in the classic
story like never before, transported not just into 19th-century Russia but also
within the characters'
worlds.
Keira Knightley reveals, "I've always loved history - reading about it,
playing it out on-screen -
because I feel it takes me out of the present; I fall into a fantasy, which I
love doing.
"But this approach was such a very different concept for this piece, not
doing a safe adaptation - and
I was so excited. Joe called me into his office and had all these drawings up
and explained it to me,
and I thought, 'Let's go for it!'"
With the lead actress setting the tone, the rest of the cast rose to the
challenge as well; producer Paul
Webster notes, "They took the text, and Joe's more simple and classical
approach, very seriously.
There could be no hint of self-consciousness, and no post-modern rationalization
of the story. The
theatricality of the vision had to be of a piece with the seriousness of the
actor's performances and
their belief in their characters' arcs."
Jude Law remarks, "These are people in a world where they are able to play
strange social games
without feeling hindered by a sense of reality. Joe created an environment where
we could step into
that world."
Tim Bevan elaborates, "When we are first introduced to Anna Karenina, her
family, and the
aristocratic society within which she plays a pivotal role, emotions are
artfully withheld as they
would have been within the high society of that time and place.
"When private feelings arise irrevocably to the surface over the course of
the film, hearts and souls
are awakened, causing reverberations throughout society."
Wright observes, "Anna is 'the perfect wife,' she's 'Madame Karenin,' and she
and her husband hold
a certain place in society. Then, a bolt of lightning - in the form of another
man - opens her up to
another way of living, of loving, and of being."
Tom Stoppard remarks, "Something happens to her which has never happened
before, something
which I would say she didn't even know about. She has not lived a deprived life,
but a life in which
something has been missing."
Wright adds, "When you think of a love story, it's Romeo and Juliet, or
star-crossed lovers, or a love
that overcomes obstacles. Yet that's not what this story is, or does. Tolstoy
himself described War and
Peace as his epic political novel and Anna Karenina as being a domestic story.
Meaning, it's about
families and love - which are epic to us all.
"The theatre setting enhances the idea that each individual is on show,
performing their given role
within society. As they watch those around them, they themselves are at the same
time being
observed. The principal characters' dilemmas are enhanced and heightened within
the artificial
environments, and the moviegoing audience will be compelled to use their
imaginations."
The theatre setting notwithstanding, Wright was looking for actors who could
be "naturalistic rather
than stylized, although capable of both - even if their characters were not. I
was excited to work with
actors in a theatre context, and so in some ways they would be a 'theatre
company.'"
Casting director Jina Jay enthuses, "There were so many rich characters -
coming from a great novel -
for actors to take on." Accordingly, Jay was able to secure estimable talent for
even the smaller roles,
but for the apex of the story's love triangle no search was ever undertaken; it
was on their most recent
picture together, Atonement, that Wright and Knightley had first had a
conversation about the actress
one day portraying Anna.
Wright was confident that Knightley could take on the emotionally complex
character and make it
her own. He reflects, "We've grown up in our movie work together, really. She
works so hard, with
such attention to detail. Keira is an incredibly strong woman, and utterly
fearless - qualities that I
wanted to play up in this movie."
Webster states, "Joe and Keira bring out the best in each other. We knew this
was going to be the most
demanding role of her career, and that she could fully embrace the challenges of
playing Anna."
Wright muses, "While in real life she is one of the most likable people you will
ever meet, on-screen
she is not afraid to court dislike if that's what the character requires. I'm
proud of her for what she's
done in our movie. She understands the darker places that some of us can go to,
and that was
definitely necessary for Anna."
Stoppard opines, "Anna behaves badly some of the time, and anyone playing her
has got to grab hold
of this nettling aspect. Neither the novel nor our film is in the business of
moral justification."
Knightley read the novel anew as preparation, and found that her own feelings
towards the character
had evolved. She says, "I remembered the book as being just incredibly romantic
with this
extraordinary character. But in re-reading the novel just before we started
filming, I found it
magnificent but also much, much darker - and realized that there is the huge
question of whether
Anna Karenina is a heroine or an anti-heroine. I believe that was so even for
Tolstoy. My copy got
heavily marked up, and Joe and I were constantly questioning ourselves about
Anna; we felt we
should show the good and the bad, the kindness and the cruelty. I also discussed
this with Tom. I
tried to understand Anna and capture her all, so Anna
Karenina became the hardest project I've
done; I knew I had to try to play her without making her 'too nice.'
"Stories like this one are lasting because they are studies on the human
condition as a whole, here
within one character. Anna is a great and fallible character, one who speaks to
what makes us human;
in her, you see the flaws, the heroics, and the terrifying emotions. You care
about her, and can't help
but recognize yourself."
Webster offers, "I think that Tolstoy himself began to fall in love with the
character of Anna, which
only reinforced the theme of falling in love in spite of yourself."
Stoppard muses, "In quite a number of upper-class aristocratic societies one
could think of a fling, an
adulterous affair, as being more or less sanctioned. This is not a particularly
Russian phenomenon by
any means; one could say it's not unknown in Britain.
"The difference between what Anna does and what umpteen other people of her
acquaintance might
have done or been doing, is that it's not a pleasant dalliance or a diversion.
This woman was very
young when she married, and has been married a good long time. For her, it is as
though she is
getting a late chance to live her real life. But doing so affects her standing
in society. As it's said, 'She
did worse than break the law, she broke the rules.'"
Bevan elaborates further on the complex iconic character who has divided
opinion for generations,
noting that "the reader and the viewer cannot help but be drawn to her story.
You know that she is
flawed, yet Anna is not necessarily a woman who one will instantly feel sympathy
for. Keira, in terms
of her exploration of the character, brings a great deal of mature artistry to
portraying her."
Law sought to do the same in playing the cuckolded older husband of Anna,
altering his own
physical appearance and conveying the quiet dignity and fortitude of a
much-respected member of
society.
Bevan marvels, "It was brave of Jude taking on the part of the older man, as
it were. He dove into this
character, and I feel that he and Tom have imparted a whole dimension to Karenin
that isn't
necessarily in the book. He's a more rounded character here, not just a cold
fish."
The actor explains, "Karenin holds an influential position within government
and is completely
focused on his work - which he is good at. He has a strict moral code of honor
and loyalty, and is
spontaneous with neither his behavior nor his affections, even in the privacy of
his own home with
his family. The significance of his wife's indiscretion has the power to
jeopardize not only their
marriage but also the entire edifice of Russian high society.
"I'm sympathetic to all the characters in the story; you need to understand
all sides, and that's part of
why Tolstoy's novel is so beloved and still engenders discussion. To me, Karenin
is ripe to have his
heart broken. My feeling is that as far as Karenin sees it, he is offering
everything that he should to the
marriage. What he doesn't necessarily bring is passion and romance, and that is
not necessarily
something that's in him; it's probably the way he was brought up, and probably
the way he observed
his parents behaving. He is carrying his heart as best he knows it."
Stoppard notes, "Karenin is, for many people, the most sympathetic member of
the triangle. We're the
product of our experience and conditioning, and that's Karenin. It's a slippery
slope if you describe
him as 'a dull man;' he is probably fascinating to other people in government
when they are talking
shop. The notion of service, to an empire itself supported by paperwork, is in
Karenin's bones."
Law adds, "What's wonderful about the part is that you see slowly and
gradually how his
vulnerability awakens; he takes his eyes off his work, which is so much a
defining part of him, and
the human being comes out to fight for his wife and family. By the end, he's
travelled quite an
interesting journey."
Knightley remarks, "Jude and I both wanted to get at how there is love
between the couple; tragically,
she doesn't think there is, and he is unable to vocalize it."
Law admits, "Those are not the easiest of scenes to play opposite another
actor; Keira and I took a lot
of time to prepare with Joe, talking about the happier times in their marriage,
so that we could push
the emotions further on-set."
Wright explains, "I wanted to give Jude the space to shine, since I know what
a great character actor
he can be; we hadn't seen him in a role like this in a while."
Aaron Taylor-Johnson was already on Wright's radar as a potential Count
Vronsky, who opens
Anna's eyes to passion but at too high a price. When Wright screen-tested the
rising star in California
with Knightley, he saw "someone who would commit to the part, coupled with a
physicality that
made Aaron perfect for the role of someone who is seductive but sensitive. Also,
Aaron is slightly
younger than Keira, and Vronsky is younger than Anna in the novel."
Webster says, "Aaron has a natural aptitude for the camera, and he is very
attuned to what it needs to
see - just how little, or how much, he needs to do in a scene."
From the first, Taylor-Johnson was "hugely impressed" with his leading lady,
as "I've never seen
anyone put in as much preparation as she did for Anna
Karenina. Her copy of the book had colorcoded
stickers, and she would check scenes with the script. I also know that she spoke
with people
who have been to some of the depths that Anna goes to.
"As an actor, she will challenge you in the best way possible. She will be
there for you 100%,
including when it's your own close-up."
Knightley praises Taylor-Johnson as being "an instinctual actor - and one
whose instincts are pretty
much bang-on every time."
Taylor-Johnson ascertains his character as being "from a privileged
background, and he is an officer
on his way up. But when he encounters Anna, his world changes dramatically; he's
never seen
anything like her, and it's extraordinary. He knows he has to have her and he
uses his charm to
engage her. He chases her even though she's a married woman; there was a
societal allowance for
mistresses and affairs, but you never left your husband or wife for someone else
because that meant
being shunned. Yet Vronsky is devoting his all to Anna; he adores her and he
can't stop."
Stoppard says, "What comes through in our film very positively is how Vronsky
takes the lead in
their relationship. He is a romantic figure, a beautiful boy."
Taylor-Johnson adds, "At first you just see his arrogance, but then you see
how much he is willing to
give up for her and how his confidence comes from the heart. Joe and I discussed
whether he was
naïve or not; I kept saying, 'He's honest.' I can relate to a lot about Vronsky,
and because of that I felt I
could play him."
The parallel story of Levin's love for Kitty is gentler and more innocent
than Anna's for Vronsky, yet
it too falters under the scrutiny of society. Actor Domhnall Gleeson had
auditioned for Wright, but it
wasn't until he performed the part of Levin at a table read - at which his
empathetic take on the
character impressed one and all - that the part suddenly became his. One facet
of the material that the
actor sought to convey was "the wry sense of humor shooting through it, which I
appreciate; this
story gets to the depths of what it means to be alive."
As Gleeson sees it, "Levin's idea of love is at the same time very pure and
blinkered, in that he sees
only this one person to love; he's shooting for the absolute ideal, which isn't
always compatible with
real life. But in the story, he is one of the only people who spends any time in
the real world; he is in a
very real place with love, one not based on artifice. That is mirrored in the
way he chooses to live his
life, which is at a distance from St. Petersburg and Moscow society - away from
the theatre, literally.
He makes his life in the real world out in the countryside, and is in fact very
preoccupied with
farming. He is outside sophisticated society.
"Even so, he's caught between the aristocracy and the serfs; he's trying to
find a home in nature while
the woman he loves is in a place which is artificial to him. But they do have a
true connection, which
means that Levin has to journey to try to win Kitty and bring her back to his
real world. He realizes
that she's an even better woman than he thought."
Kitty is played by up-and-coming Swedish actress Alicia Vikander, in her
first English-language role.
The role promised an emotional journey for Vikander to undertake, with her
character beginning as
an innocent and radiant ingénue before experiencing heartbreak upon Vronsky's
rejecting her and
then coming to terms with life and love.
The actress' years of real-life training as a ballet dancer proved
beneficial. She notes, "Domhnall and I
worked with [choreographer] Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui to get into contact with the
characters through
movement. How Kitty walks or runs into a room at the start of the story and how
she is in the last
scenes, there's a complete difference. She proves herself to be very un-judgemental,
considering her
status in society, and this better prepares her for what comes later."
Bevan says, "Audiences may not have seen Domhnall or Alicia before, but they
are excellent - and, as
they are also young people like their characters, there is a freshness to their
work."
"They complement each other," agrees Webster. "Alicia grasped the opportunity
of this role with
both hands, and Domhnall shows what a powerful actor he is."
Invited to reunite with the filmmakers and leading lady with whom he made
Pride & Prejudice,
BAFTA Award winner Matthew Macfadyen leapt at the chance to portray Oblonksy,
Anna's brother.
The actor enthuses, "Oblonsky is incorrigible; he's disarmingly direct and
brings humor and warmth
to the story as he tries to help the people he loves and cares about,
particularly in attempting to be a
matchmaker for his friend Levin.
"Oblonsky is one of those people who lights up a dinner party when they come
in. He has a
wandering eye. He likes the pleasures of the flesh, drinking and eating; to me,
he was a very
attractive character because he doesn't suffer from terrible introspection. I
don't see him as 'a bad
man,' and I hugely enjoyed playing this part - except for the moustache I had to
grow."
"Matthew is a hoot in this role," enthuses Emmy Award-winning actress Kelly
Macdonald, who
signed on to play Dolly, wife of Oblonsky and sister-in-law to Anna. "He's
played Oblonsky in just
the right way: charismatic, frustrating, lovable - and selfishly addicted to
passion."
The actress felt that she understood Dolly's temperament, remarking that
"Dolly is married to a man
she adores, she's passionate about her family, and she's pregnant all the time.
She is completely
happy with her lot in life before finding out about her husband's affair with
the woman who is meant
to be looking after their children.
"So it's devastating for her when she realizes that she's been made a fool of
and her relationship with
Anna, whom she admires and with whom she shares a sisterly love, helps her. She
refines her focus
on family. I feel that in the end Dolly resigns herself to his behavior; she
loves her husband and she
knows he loves her. But she is not brave enough to attempt what Anna does, which
is to seek an
independent life - one that no woman in that time and place could really have."
As a two-time Olivier Award winner, Ruth Wilson's stage experience made her
particularly well-qualified
for the movie's theatrical setting; as Princess Betsy Tverskoy, the actress is
resplendent in
dramatic and exotic costumes amidst high-society artificiality. Wilson admits,
"I had free rein from
Joe to be more excessive than I would have been in a more traditional period
drama. It was great fun
to work with [dialect coach] Jill McCullough on Betsy's speaking voice.
"Betsy also speaks to this film's themes of love, class, and moral conduct,
in that she represents a
superficial level of love, lust, and desire; everything is for show, as she
exists in a world which is all
about beauty and image over anything substantial. Her soirée is like a goldfish
bowl for people trying
to appear rich and powerful, and real feeling is lacking."
Countess Vronsky, the cynical mother of Count Vronsky and his brother
Alexander, is portrayed by
Olivia Williams. Having worked with Wright on Hanna, she was keen to rejoin him
on Anna
Karenina, having found that "making a movie with Joe and his team is a genuine
collaboration."
Williams was intrigued by her character, "an aging beauty - that's a phrase
which Tom Stoppard put
in the stage directions - and to play her I decided to channel [Academy
Award-winning actress]
Peggy Ashcroft.
"There's subtext to my character's introductory scene with Anna; her foremost
motivation is
ambition, with love a long way down the list. She feels she has a façade to
maintain, trying to
preserve a fabulous society history. There were many details that I worked out
for the character with
the costume and hair and make-up departments. But at one point Joe did have to
tell me, 'Don't wear
your subtext!'"
Two-time Academy Award nominee Emily Watson was tapped to play Countess Lydia
Ivanovna,
who claims the moral high ground in disapproving of Anna's behavior. The actress
opines, "Her
fervor is probably repressed sexual energy, and she mistakes her own passion for
Karenin for
religious zeal. She sails about like a steam ship, and the costumes gave me that
sense of posture.
"This story is so sophisticated, set in a time more valorous and chivalrous than
our own, and we're
doing it in a way which I found liberating."
Michelle Dockery, who had filmed a memorable cameo for Wright in Hanna just
before coming to
world attention in the television series phenomenon Downton Abbey, appears in
Anna
Karenina as
Princess Myagkaya, who is "one of the socialites within Betsy's circle. I love
Joe's detailed way of
working, and this was quite a fun character to play; she takes an interest in
Anna and although I
would like to think that she does it out of the goodness of her heart, I believe
it's more that she likes
being associated with a scandal!"
Count Vronsky's brother Alexander Vronsky is played by French actor Raphael
Personnaz, who
joined the Anna
Karenina cast for his first English-language role. Personnaz saw his character
as
being "dominated by what his mother thinks and wants, and the codes of society.
Joe's word to me
about the character was 'square.' I feel that Alexander doesn't have any love in
his life, so he's a sad
character in a way. Yet at that period in Russia, I don't know that happiness
and love were a goal for
most people; in this story, Anna and Count Vronsky are exceptions."
Macdonald remarks, "This is a great ensemble; I'd be looking forward to
seeing this movie even if I
weren't in it. There are a number of scenes with lots of actors in them, but
with Joe's enthusiasm you
never feel like you are getting lost."
Macfadyen adds, "Joe has the knack of making everyone feel they're like
family. He is always
interested in actors and their processes."
Webster reports, "With the rehearsals they've had, the actors come to the set
comfortable with who
their characters are. Joe leaves them room to improvise, and allows for happy
accidents that will
enrich their process - and his."
Next Production Note Section
TOP
Home | Theaters | Video | TV
Your Comments and Suggestions are Always Welcome.
Contact
CinemaReview.com
© 2013 34®, All Rights Reserved.
|