Navigation Bar - Text Links at Bottom of Page

THE TAKING OF PELHAM 123

About The Film
Director Tony Scott frames the hijacking of a subway train and the subsequent standoff between cops and crooks as a terrifying cat-and-mouse game, pitting an ordinary, overburdened train dispatcher, played by Denzel Washington, against a mercurial vengeful killer portrayed by John Travolta in the new action thriller The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3. 

Washington says that he was attracted to the role by finding a most unusual character at the center of the action-thriller. "He's not a cop, he is a civil servant,” the actor explains. "When he's confronted with Ryder's demands, he's like, ‘Look, where's the hostage negotiator? This is not what I do.' Walter Garber is not a superhero. He's scared.”

Similarly, John Travolta found his character, Ryder, to be loaded with possibilities. "Playing a bad guy is freeing because good guys restrain themselves,” explains Travolta. "With a bad guy you can create your own moral fiber for him in varying degrees, and usually out of a wide envelope of behavior. I can be wild, calm, nutty, charming, or whatever I want.”

The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 began life as a bestselling novel by John Godey. The book's central puzzle kept readers guessing. Who would rob a subway train? You'd have to be crazy – the subway is a closed system. Even if you get the money, there's nowhere to escape. The novel was first adapted for the screen in 1974, starring Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw, and today remains a cult classic.

The filmmakers approached the new adaptation – Scott, screenwriter Brian Helgeland, and producers Todd Black, Jason Blumenthal, and Steve Tisch, along with Scott – not as a remake of the classic film, which they felt stands on its own. Instead, they returned to the novel, retelling the story as a highly contemporary thriller and reinventing it for a modern-day New York. "It's a great story, yet unknown to new generations of filmgoers,” Scott says. "The world, and New York City in particular, has changed a lot since 1974.”

John Travolta says that though the new film has some of the same elements as the first adaptation, the new film is "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 on steroids – very intense, very hyped up, and very contemporary.”

"I've always liked stories where people are put in extreme circumstances, and you see how they respond when things go wrong,” says Helgeland, who won an Oscar® for his script for L.A. Confidential. He approached producer Todd Black, for whom Helgeland had written and directed A Knight's Tale. 

"We watched the movie again and realized what a fun story it was,” remembers Black, whose producing credits include The Pursuit of Happyness and Knowing. "It felt right not for a remaking, but a retelling.” 

That retelling would set the film apart from the earlier adaptation in crucial ways. "I was interested in developing much more of a relationship between the dispatcher and the hijacker,” says Helgeland. "I felt neither the novel nor the original movie really forced Garber and Ryder to crawl under each other's skin to figure each other out.”

The dispatcher, Garber, seeks to clear a stain on his reputation: a charge of bribery that resulted in his demotion from MTA administrator to dispatcher and now drives him to go head-to-head with the hijacker. "He believes if he helps the people on the train, he can make amends,” Helgeland says. "Garber seeks redemption.” 

By contrast, Ryder seeks revenge. Travolta's Ryder is terrifyingly intelligent and red-hot manic, one moment showing mercy, then in a split second exploding in deadly fury. In his previous life, he thrived on Wall Street until imprisoned for embezzlement; now his motivations include settling a score with New York City. 

The characters are as opposed as the worlds they inhabit. "Garber works for MTA<

Next Production Note Section

TOP

Home | Theaters | Video | TV

Your Comments and Suggestions are Always Welcome.
Contact CinemaReview.com

2014 7,  All Rights Reserved.

Google

Find:  HELP!

Google