Navigation Bar - Text Links at Bottom of Page


Being Flynn
"A strange balancing act;" Q&A with writer/director Paul Weitz

Q: When you began preparing Being Flynn in 2004, you had already been writer/director on one surrogate father/son story, About a Boy; and were in post-production on a second, In Good Company. So was this actual father/son story then that much more of a draw for you?

Paul Weitz: Not in a particularly conscious way. I read Nick's book, and the core story stuck with me. This idea of the disparity between a powerful father figure and how you see them functioning in the world is, I think, central to a lot of people's lives.

First off, although my dad [the late John Weitz] was a successful fashion designer, he also would have preferred to have been known as a writer. He wrote a couple of a nonfiction biographies and novels which were published. He was, I think, both driven and haunted by his ideal of being a writer. I myself have wondered about how much of what drives you towards work is egotism, and how much of it is something purer than that. This story's situation is of a young guy with a father who fancies himself a great writer but who has never actually been able to finish anything. The idea that Nick had this father with a destructive, egotistical relationship to writing and that Nick ended up being a successful writer and doing all the mundane, boring things that it takes to actually write, really spoke to me.

Especially, I think, when one works in Hollywood; even more so than when writing just pure literature, you're constantly having to question why you're doing what you're doing. Is it for success? Is it because you want to be critically lauded? Or is it because there's something simpler and more important than that, in terms of bringing something into being?

Q: Were there other overlapping points of interest beyond family history and creativity?

PW: The aspects of both drug abuse and alcoholism in the story spoke to me as well. My dad was of the generation where one might occasionally have a Chivas Regal at 11 in the morning, and I - when I was younger - had to face the thought that I was drawn to obliterating my own personality with alcohol and drugs. The aspect of self-obliteration tying into ego and also tying into creativity was a strong element of this; for me, it wasn't just a father/son story, but a story about the joys and pitfalls of creativity.

Nick is a poet, and the book happened to be utterly beautiful; it was one of the rare books that I read where, the more often I read it the more patterns I would see in it. That would have been daunting were it not for the fact that Nick himself is such an encouraging person; he gave me license to create a version of his story that is extremely personal to me.

Q: What do you feel was the deciding factor of getting Nick Flynn to trust you, back in 2004 when you first met?

PW: A strange balancing act; I was able to personalize certain things about the story, although I never put someone else's experiences as directly akin to mine. But I was able to express why I felt deeply about it. We became friends during the course of the whole experience, and I was glad that it turned out I was not bulls-ting Nick about eventually making the film. I think Nick read almost all of those 30 drafts [laughs], even the ones that didn't live up to what I hoped the film would be. Like a lot of intelligent people who have gone through trying things, Nick is a relativist; he gets the joke on an essential level. He felt that I was always honoring the core of what he'd done by writing the book. He's a friggin' nice guy, and I managed to get him to largely put his life on hold and stick around during shooting, to make sure that Bob De Niro, Paul Dano, and I felt that there was somebody who could tell us if something was BS or not.

When I was first meeting with Nick, I said, "I need to ask you a favor; I'd like to be talking about a character named Nick Flynn. So I'm not going to say, 'You do this' or 'You do that.' It's going to be 'Nick does this' or 'Nick does that.' Is that OK with you?" And Nick was fine with it, although I think he is writing a memoir about the experience of having a film madeā€¦

He is into detaching from things, and keeping his ego at bay so that he can see more clearly what is going on in the world. The moment he bought into the idea that Nick Flynn in the movie was a character, it gave me license to have the character doing and saying things that Nick never did or said.

Just by the act of writing a memoir, you're taking a step away from what one would think of as reality; Nick understands that, even in the act of writing a memoir, you're creating a character. This distinguishes him from people he would be on the reading circuit with, people who, it later turned out, were lying about their personal history.

A common ground for us was a feeling that we were each in our own way burning inside about how much of oneself is inherited and how much of oneself one can create. We both aspire to be unpretentious - [laughs] I aspire to that, but I think Nick achieves it.

You get the feeling, as you grow older, that you don't really make new friends in life. But this feels like a friendship of value, that Nick is a friend to have for the distance.

Q: You went a distance with him in terms of working on the script for years.

PW: When you work on so many drafts, for seven years, it occurs to you that you might go on and on doing endless rewrites - and never make the movie, which sounds like it might be a bad thing. But it is, in fact, quite reassuring; because if you never make it, you'll never have to contend with a particular version of it which might not live up to what you see as the potential.

Very luckily, I didn't get to make it four years in, because that would have been at a studio with more of a mandate to try to make mainstream films - and that would have been fairly fatal for this. There are filmmakers who work at their craft in a marvelous vacuum and don't sully themselves with commercial thoughts; I have not been in that vacuum. [laughs] I've learned a lot from mistakes that I've made - as well as from things that I've done properly. As I was making Being Flynn, I felt that I was using every iota of what I've learned over the last 10 years of making films, putting it towards making this as much what it needed to be as possible. By the time it did get made, I was firm in my decision-making process, aesthetically, which allowed me to film Being Flynn quickly, on a tight schedule.

Q: In terms of the adaptation - the final draft that was filmed - what was the single biggest change, or telescoping, that you had to make?

PW: Admitting that because the budget was low I was not going to be able to shoot a lot that wouldn't end up in the film; I wasn't going to be able to experiment with certain things. I had to boil the film down to its essence, get to the bones of it.

That essence, as I see it, includes - something in the memoir that Nick would not necessarily refer to - the logic of self-hatred, and how one deals with it. I don't think Nick was consciously dwelling on that but in a memoir about self-destructiveness it's going to be part of the discussion.

Q: You have to impose perspective; otherwise, you can't make a movie. PW: No question, but I also wanted to honor the poetical structure of the book. There are some metaphors from the book which fell by the wayside in favor of other ones from the book.

There was a section in the book where Nick finds out that his grandfather was the inventor of a particular lifeboat, and an


Home | Theaters | Video | TV

Your Comments and Suggestions are Always Welcome.

© 2018 34®,  All Rights Reserved.


Find:  HELP!